Scott Walker has disappointed. I have top two now, Cruz and Ben…JUST yesterday Ben moved up in a Monmouth University Poll
FULL transcript from MsM no less
What most people don’t know is that: Peggy Hubbard is a native of Ferguson, Missouri, but now lives in Rockville, Illinois. According to her Facebook page, she’s a Navy veteran who has since retired from working at the IRS. Her photos show her at events featuring bikers and the confederate flag.
Earlier in August 2015, Hubbard wrote that her cousin, Michael, had become the new police chief in East St. Louis. Fox St. Louis reported at the time that Michael Hubbard is a 19 year veteran of the East St. Louis department. The station says he was hired because of his “strong reputation for community policing and inspiring excellence through ethical leadership.”
Peggy Hubbard tears down #BlackLivesMatter on Don Lemon CNN . Woman Who Posted Viral #BlackLivesMatter Rant Hits Back at Critics: ‘Bite Me’. Peggy Hubbard, the woman who posted a #BlackLivesMatter rant that went viral, appeared on CNN tonight to tell Don Lemon why she thinks the movement has misplaced priorities.
Hubbard told Lemon that police officers across the country are worried either about being killed or being “the next Darren Wilson” because of the strong anti-police sentiment.
Peggy Hubbard had a very strong emotional reaction to the case of St. Louis officers fatally shooting a black 18-year-old who reportedly had a handgun and the death of a 9-year-old in Ferguson who was killed in a drive-by shooting.
It outraged Hubbard that activists protested for “the thug” and said, “Are you ‘fugging’ kidding me? Police brutality? How about black brutality. You black people, my black people, you are the ‘fugging’ most violent ‘motherfuggers I have ever seen in my life.”
She said the “black lives matter” mantra should be applied equally to black-on-black crime and elaborated, “327 homicides later y’all want to holler police brutality? Black people, you’re a fucking joke. You’re tearing up communities over thugs and criminals.”
She added, “You shoot at them, they’re gonna shoot at you.”
Full initial rant …
WARNING: Explicit language
New FOLLOW UP Reply to Viral Black Lives Matter Video :
Good morning everyone. I apologize for the language I used yesterday in my rant. Peggy was very upset yesterday because of the deterioration of our society and our neighborhoods and losing that little girl.
As a mother, wife and grandmother I was very upset. I have a grandchild that age and it broke my heart; because what if it was my grandson or grand daughter.
I apologize for my language. My mother did teach me better than that. I’m going to refrain from using that type of language.
What the American people know and what the families of victims of violent crime know is that this Administration has consistently and steadfastly placed the goal of amnesty above the goal of public safety. Time and time and time again that has been the fact…
If this Administration spent one-tenth of the effort on enforcement and protecting people from crimes and punishing people who are criminals who violate our immigration laws, rather than on amnesty we’d be a lot safer today. Many of the people who have been injured, robbed, or killed by illegal aliens would be alive today. That’s just fact and everybody knows it.
Hat tip: YHN
BIRMINGHAM, Ala. — On Monday’s edition of Yellowhammer Radio, Host Cliff Sims received a call that is likely to raise more than a few eyebrows. A Birmingham resident named Raul, an American citizen of Mexican descent and a self-described conservative, called in to discuss his perspective on illegal immigration and Donald Trump’s controversial comments on the issue.
“Trump has figured out a way to attract voters,” he said. “What he is doing is firing up our base…he’s touching our hearts and minds and there’s no other candidate that’s really doing that… He rubbed people the wrong way [on immigration] by saying it the way he did. However, it needed to be said.”
Raul’s comments may come as a surprise to many people who have watched the backlash to Trump’s comments on Mexican immigrants.
“There are a lot of bad people coming across [the border],” he explained. “When my parents came across in the late 50s, they came across for a better life. I thank God every day that they came here because I’m living the dream — the American dream. They came the right way, they weren’t here illegally… There has to be a limit to who’s coming in and there has to be a watchful eye as to who we’re letting in.”
Bill Clinton’s mentor from Arkansas, J. William Fulbright, was a proud segregationist! And Bill Clinton signed a proclamation authorizing the Confederate flag to fly over the statehouse in Arkansas. I’ve got the proclamation right there in my formerly nicotine-stained fingers.
Where’d the Republicans get involved in this? But there they are, in full blame! ~ Rush
Rush Limbaugh gave listeners a history lesson on the Confederate flag flying on the grounds of the Statehouse in South Carolina. Limbaugh noted that the flag is an issue because of Democrats, not Republicans.
Folks, do you realize the Confederate flag flies because of the Democrat Party? Do people even care anymore about truth, objective truth, ontological certitude? – Rush Limbaugh
“There’s a reason why that Confederate flag flies over the Statehouse in South Carolina,” he added. And that reason, he said, is one man — a well-known Democrat named Ernest “Fritz” Hollings, a former U.S. Senator who once complained that there’s “too much consuming going on out there.”
In an article at the Boston Herald, Howie Carr also noted that it was Hollings who first put the flag on the Statehouse in 1962. Moreover, Limbaugh said, it was a conservative Republican governor who first tried to get the flag removed from that building.
According to The Examiner:
Newsbusters noted that aside from Fox News, most of the broadcast media never mentioned the entire history of the South Carolina flag. Two networks mentioned the flag, but never said it was a Democrat who put it there
GEERT WILDERS – ROBERT SPENCER – PAMELA GELLER :
Brought to you by Tom Trento and…
Streamed live on May 3, 2015
The first annual Muhammad Art Exhibit and Contest will be held on Sunday, May 3, at the Curtis Culwell Center, 5-7 pm, CENTRAL TIME, in the Dallas suburb of Garland, Texas. It will be hosted by human rights and free-speech activist Pamela Geller and her organization, the American Freedom Defense Initiative (AFDI).
The exhibit will feature images of Islam’s prophet in both historical and contemporary settings, showcasing the top 200 artistic renditions that were submitted for consideration. The winner will be announced at the event, and a $10,000 prize will be awarded.
The keynote speaker will be Geert Wilders, a member of The Netherlands Parliament. Wilders led the fight for de-Islamization in his country, which has faced many of the same problems with Muslim assimilation as have other European countries, including the advent of controversial “no-go zones” inaccessible to non-Muslims, including public officials.
In honor of our family friend and her unborn child, Francheska “Cheeka” Velez:
Tomorrow the US Army will present Purple Hearts to those injured & killed by terrorism at Ft Hood. Why it matters: @SenTedCruz
Army Secretary John McHugh announced in February the service would award the medals, calling the gesture “an appropriate recognition of their service and sacrifice.” While opponents of President Obama predict he will attempt to garner credit for this “change of heart and the water-carrying news media will help him, it was the Republicans in the U.S. Congress who got these heroes their medals and benefits,” said former Naval officer and federal law enforcement official Charles Collingwood.
Special thanks to The Blaze for producing a moving documentary to tell this story:
Waiting For Justice
The victims say they feel abandoned by the U.S. government and by their military. The Pentagon last year fought efforts to award the Purple Heart out of concern that doing so could harm Hasan’s chance at receiving a fair trial.
Courtesy of the U.S. Army/DOD: Father and daughter say prayers for the ’14’ victims of Fort Hood
In Full Broken Heart: “For The Record” on the Fort Hood Shooting …
Read the full story Roadblock for Justice
U.S. and Iranian officials have described last week’s framework for a deal to slow Iran’s nuclear weapons program with disturbingly different details. According to a Times of Israel report Tuesday, the U.S. account also differs significantly with a key ally – France.
The proposed deal lets Iran continue to develop use advanced centrifuges which could allow for uranium enrichment as much as 20 times faster than the Islamic Republic’s current technology. After 12 years, Iran can actually resume enriching uranium, which the newspaper reported “would enable Iran to more rapidly accumulate the highly enriched uranium needed to build nuclear weapons, accelerating its breakout time to the bomb.” The source is an internal French government fact-sheet which the newspaper was able to review, but which has not been released publicly.
That timeline, however, dovetails with an acknowledgment President Obama made this week in an interview with National Public Radio. Iran’s “break-out” time to make a bomb could shrink “almost down to zero” by year 13 after any final deal is negotiated, Obama said.
Israeli analyst Ehud Yaari identified six terms in the proposed agreement in which the United States and Iran have offered different assessments. Among them: Iran believes it stands to secure immediate relief from crippling economic sanctions, while the U.S. says that relief comes in phases as various commitments are met. In addition, Iran believes it can continue to use the Fordo underground uranium enrichment plant for developing centrifuges, while the U.S. says no enrichment could take place there for 15 years.
Israeli Strategic Affairs Minister Yuval Steinitz briefed reporters Monday on recommendations which could lead to “a more reasonable agreement.” The Fordow plant must be shut down entirely, inspectors must be able to make unannounced visits “anywhere, anytime” and development of new centrifuges must be prohibited, he said.
Although Israel prefers a diplomatic solution to the issue, Steinitz acknowledged, it was still reserving the right to take military action against Iran should it be necessary.
“It’s still on the table, it’s going to remain on the table,” he said. “It’s our right and duty to decide how to defend ourselves, especially if our national security and even very existence are under threat.”