Jun 242014
 

The top U.S. official in charge of archiving federal records testified Tuesday that the IRS ran afoul of the law by neglecting to tell his office that a trove of emails from the woman at the center of the targeting scandal disappeared after an apparent hard drive crash.

Archivist of the U.S. David Ferriero, speaking before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, made clear that federal agencies are supposed to report whenever their records are destroyed or even accidentally deleted. But he said that after emails from embattled IRS official Lois Lerner vanished after a computer failure in 2011, nobody told the National Archives.

“They did not follow the law,” Ferriero said.

Witness and Testimony Documents:

* IRS Obstruction PART II

* Full Article…

Share
Jun 202014
 

Yellowhammer News CEO Cliff Sims interviewed Alabama Gov. Robert Bentley on Tuesday for Yellowhammer’s weekly series, The Exchange. The full interview will air on Sunday, but in a particularly revealing portion of the interview previewed here, Bentley recalls a conversation he had earlier this year with Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Gina McCarthy.

“I spoke to Gina McCarthy, who is the head of EPA, I had dinner with her in Washington when I was up there in February,” Bentley recalled. “She was trying to explain to me about this 37 percent emissions standard.”

FULL article

Share
Jun 072014
 

“Hollywood’s War on U.S. Energy Part II” shows you the Hollywood attack on American energy independence goes straight to the top . . .

In our NEWEST video, Oscar-award winning actress Susan Sarandon and her business manager have been caught exposing their willingness to disguise the Middle Eastern funding of an anti-American energy independence film.

In a blockbuster new video, Project Veritas exposes more of the darker side of how Hollywood funds its anti-fracking propaganda.

New York Times Bestselling Author and investigative filmmaker, James O’Keefe, released the second part of “Exposé: Hollywood’s War on U.S. Energy.”

The much-anticipated sequel includes a cameo appearance from Oscar-winning actress and outspoken activist Susan Sarandon, and features Chris Talbott, a 20-year member of Sarandon’s team and a Documentary Fellow of the Sundance Film Program.

In the video, three undercover video journalists posing as “Muhammed” (the Middle Eastern oil baron), “Brandon,” and “Steven” (the advertising executives) meet with Sarandon. Sarandon refers “Muhammed” to Chris Talbott, her Activism Manager and one of the producers of her Oscar-winning film “Dead Man Walking.”

With the introduction made by Sarandon, the video journalists posing as “Muhammed” and “Steven” meet with Talbott a week later. The meeting was caught on tape. Talbott confirms to “Muhammed” that he “told Susan we were meeting today” and that he “speaks with Susan or her assistant every day.”

Once again, similar to the investigative report of Academy Awards Governor Ed Begley Jr., Actress Mariel Hemingway, and Environmental Filmmaker Josh Tickell, the offer is made for millions of funding for an environmental documentary aimed at ending domestic natural gas production in the US.

Once again, “Muhammed” seemingly finds a willing recipient of the money — even after clearly stating that his goal is to use environmentalist propaganda to undermine fracking and destroy American energy independence. The stated motive: Profit for his family’s oil empire.

Project Veritas founder and president, James O’Keefe, stated Wednesday:

“This latest investigation proves that the Tickell-Begley-Hemingway deal-making was not an isolated incident. The Hollywood environmentalist left is willing to take money from explicitly anti-American interests to fund their movies. The American people deserve to know the truth about how movies are made and the lengths Hollywood will go to undermine American energy independence and national security.”

O’Keefe noted: “Of course, the best film franchises are usually trilogies.”

But don’t take my word for it. Watch the video:

Share
May 072014
 

The White House asked for this investigation by not telling the truth in the first place.

By Kirsten Powers, USA Today

Diversion, subterfuge, Benghazi, Benghazi, Benghazi. …Why aren’t we talking about something else?” House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi complained last week.

Here’s why: An e-mail has surfaced from a deputy national security adviser to Susan Rice on how to characterize the Sept. 11, 2012, attack on Sunday news programs. He advised Rice, then ambassador to the U.N., that her primary goal was to “underscore that these protests are rooted in an Internet video, and not a broader failure of policy.” The e-mail was redacted when the most-transparent-administration-in-history provided Benghazi documents to Congress earlier, but was found through a Freedom of Information Act request.

Democrats are furious that the House will hold a vote to create a select committee to investigate the administration’s response to the attack in Libya that left four Americans dead. They know this won’t end well.


It took real effort for the White House to overlook the tsunami of evidence that contradicted its campaign talking points. Before Rice’s appearances on Sept. 16, 2012, National Public Radio reported that Libya’s president had told NPR that al-Qaeda was responsible for the “precalculated, preplanned attack.” Former deputy CIA director Mike Morell testified last month, “Analysts said from the get-go that al-Qaeda was involved.”

Kudos to Kirsten for speaking TRUTH!

Read Kirsten’s full piece here

featured image in magazine shows what obama/clinton did to our four murdered Americans…

turn back on

Share
May 062014
 

This is from an interview on July 15, 2013 with Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., he told a radio interviewer today he doubts former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s claims about not having knowledge of weapons transfers when asked about the matter during sworn testimony in a Senate hearing on Benghazi.

During the hearing in March, in response to a question from Paul, Clinton stated she did not know whether the U.S. mission in Libya was procuring or transferring weapons to Turkey and other Arab countries.

Those weapons transfers were allegedly intended to arm the rebels fighting in Syria.

Yet a New York Times report claimed that since early 2012, the CIA has been helping Arab governments and Turkey obtain and ship weapons to the Syrian rebels.

“I’m concerned about the veracity of how she responded,” Paul told “Aaron Klein Investigative Radio” on New York’s WABC Radio.

THIS is what the dems want to hide with all their talk this weekend of boycotting etc. It was the policy in Fast and Furious and the timing of these weapons being stolen!

See:

* Catherine Herridge October 2012: Was Syrian weapons shipment factor in ambassador’s Benghazi visit?

* From the lib rag Daily Kos, JUST 4 days after Benghazi attack:an article in Times of London, Shipload of Looted Missiles From Libya Arrives in Turkey .

The Kos acknowledged then that al Qaeda attacked the US Consulate in Benghazi. Three days after that attack, The Times (UK) carried a story that a Libyan freighter loaded with stolen SA-7 antiaircraft missiles had offloaded at a Turkish port. But the WH soveled Susan Rice even then it was about a video! This article is fully loaded, please read it. Obviously Daily Kos didn’t get the WH memo.

The ‘Truth’ of the Cover-Up can be found HERE.

Also JUST In Today from Rand Paul: Rand Paul: ‘Was #Benghazi a Cover-Up for Something else?’

You bet it was, but can they prove it? I hope it comes out in the Select Committee Hearing. ~ JP

Share
May 062014
 

Sure it was, JUST like Fast and furious, Gun Walking in Benghazi? { ~ JP Today } Did Obama Stage Benghazi Attack? What if Obama was at it again, except this time instead of arming Mexican drug cartels, he was arming Syrian rebels? Listen to Catherine Herridge speak on HIDING the shipments to Syrian Jihadists. Was Syrian weapons shipment factor in ambassador’s Benghazi visit? See that report! ~JP


Share
May 062014
 


Why did the WH ‘classify’ UNclassified documents? When all they redacted were WHO the email was sen to from ‘Dude’. They brag how they released thousands of docs, sure ALL heavily redacted! ~JP

trey cover

Share
May 012014
 


See: Why Benghazi Should Matter To Every American By K.T. McFarland

Share
Apr 112014
 

Heritage’s newly updated Obamacare in Pictures has 15 charts that show the law’s effects on Americans—from canceled insurance policies to new taxes, Medicare cuts, reduced choice for plans, and more.

Talking about Obamacare’s effects is one thing; seeing hard data is another.

1

2

YOUNG PEOPLE:

Obamacare says you can stay on your parents’ health insurance until you turn 26. This chart looks at what happens after that—if you don’t have employer-sponsored insurance and you have to get insured through Obamacare. If you’re trying to save for a car or house—or just paying rent to have your own place—seeing your premiums double is quite a blow.

27

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

13

SENIORS:

You may recall Heritage experts’ warning that Obamacare would cut $716 billion from Medicare. That’s still happening.

Despite the Obama administration’s recent walking back of Medicare Advantage cuts for this year, Obamacare’s planned cuts to Medicare are moving forward. This chart shows which parts of Medicare are affected.

Heritage expert Alyene Senger has explained that, instead of cutting waste, fraud, and abuse in the Medicare program, Obamacare targets the amounts Medicare service providers are paid. These cuts have ripple effects on seniors. Doctors, nursing homes, and other providers who can’t afford to be part of Medicare any more will cut back or stop participating—and that means fewer options and less access to care for seniors.

12

14

ALL AMERICANS:

This chart looks a lot like a heartbeat—and it tracks one of Obamacare’s vital signs: public opinion. There has been a 10-point gap between support for and opposition to the law for some time now. That spike in opposition/sharp decline in support? It coincides with the flood of cancellation notices that landed in Americans’ mailboxes last year.

Obamacare remains unpopular because it’s raising taxes, killing jobs, and cutting Americans’ health care choices. We need health reform that reverses these trends.

last

Share