Where’s the question Jesse? The answer has been there from the time he was born. We are on the inside looking out. obama is looking in from the outside. He went to a madrassa, had a communist mother & grandparents. So Jesse, WHERE is there any question obama has destroyed us by design! ~JP
Jesse Watters named several reasons why many Americans have lost trust in President Obama following the Paris attacks.
The “Watters’ World” host criticized Obama’s meeting with French president Francois Hollande Tuesday, saying, “I don’t think Americans care if we rebuke the terrorists. I think we should be nuking the terrorists.”
Watters added, “He gave a warning before he dropped bombs on ISIS…dropped leaflets saying ‘we’re going to bomb you.’ And then he goes into the Iranian nuclear facility, ‘we’re going to give you a 24-day notice. Then he’s whispering to the Russian president, ‘I need a little more flexibility.’
“People wonder where this guy’s allegiances are? This is why people wonder about where the president stands.”
GOP presidential candidate Donald Trump’s latest video, posted online Monday, portrays Democratic presidential front-runner Hillary Clinton laughing over flaming images of the Benghazi attack.
“Hillary has been having a laugh at our expense for years,” reads text at the beginning of the video, followed immediately with a series of video clips of the former secretary of State chuckling.
Clinton’s laughter can be heard while several news clips fly across the screen highlighting several controversies, from Whitewater to the recent federal investigation into her private email arrangement while at State.
The final clip of Clinton laughing — taken from her testimony on Capitol Hill last month before the House committee investigating the 2012 terrorist attacks on a U.S. diplomatic compound in Benghazi, Libya — is overlaid on burning images from the attack, which left four Americans dead.
Her laughing in the video jumps to text to finish the ad: “Don’t let the joke be on us!”
Colleen Cohen Faculty Director of Affirmative Action and a Professor of Anthropology at Vassar College
In an unbelievable act of political correctness, one faculty member actually took a copy of the Constitution and destroyed it with a paper shredder. Another came close, but had to wait for her secretary to come back to be able to use the shredder.
When you watch this video, you’ll hear a professor say the Constitution is an oppressive document. And another discusses removing the Constitution from their campus. . . permanently.
Nov 5, 2015…
Officials at Cornell, Syracuse, and Yale destroy U.S. Constitution. Cornell’s Elizabeth McGrath shreds the constitution, Syracuse’s Sheila Johnson-Willis, cuts it up with a pair of scissors, and Yale’s Jason Killheffer actually uses his bare hands to rip the constitution to shreds.
Also, Elizabeth McGrath is captured on hidden camera saying “Like I said before, it is a very flawed document and it is written by flawed individuals.”
And Jason Killheffer is caught on hidden camera saying:
“I am happy to take it and shred it [the constitution] in my office.” and when asked on hidden camera about banning the constitution, his response: “I hope so, I mean, that’s – that would be like I said, my expectation is if someone were distributing or, you know, posting offensive materials, that the dean would – would listen to that and take some sort of action as appropriate, you know.”
Part 2 of this series exposes how administrators are willing to shred the Constitution because it makes a student “have nightmares”.
This is happening across the country, and we won’t stop exposing this extreme political correctness happening across college campuses.
Although he has been a congressman for almost two decades, his relationships on Capitol Hill are not as much of an open book as Boehner’s. Ryan works late hours, sleeps in his office, and travels home every weekend, so his Washington social life is almost nonexistent. Instead, Ryan has built a circle of friends and advisors in the House around three passions: policy, fitness, and family.
Rep. Mo Brooks (AL-05 Huntsville), addressed the U.S. House, (10/27/15) submitting for the Congressional Record, a letter agreed to by Rep. Paul Ryan (WI-01) which formalizes pledges that, if (Has been) elected Speaker, Ryan will not bring up immigration reform “so long as Barack Obama is president” and Ryan will not allow any immigration bill to reach the floor for a vote unless it is supported by a majority of Republican House Members.
Struggling American families have lost more than 8 million job opportunities to illegal aliens. All lower and middle income American workers have suffered from suppressed wages caused by the surge in both illegal alien and lawful immigrant labor supply.
Your past record and current stance on immigration conflicts with the values of the Americans I represent and causes great concern to me and the Americans I represent.
Brooks (also) (Gary Palmer AL-6) and other House Freedom Caucus members had concerns that Ryan may use the role of Speaker to push through immigration policies that will suppress the wages of and take even more jobs from struggling American families.
I want to ask Rep. Brooks what will happen if he breaks pledge?
This is the first I’ve reported on the PP videos etal. THIS needs to be seen and shared! Each time a video is exposed it is worse then the previous one. Is there nothing immoral these evil people won’t do?! ~ JP
Charles C. Johnson acquired all the Planned Parenthood videos, in defiance of a federal court order to censor them. I’ve put them on YouTube and torrent (please help seed on latter). For those of you that have the stomach for watching hours of very kosher women gleefully discussing baby meat, here’s the YouTube:
In one of the most shocking confessions by abortion advocates to date, they share their enthusiasm for the burning of aborted babies into “energy” to power homes.
GotNews.com will contest any unconstitutional prior restraint of speech all the way to the highest courts in the land.
Yesterday we were hit with an unconstitutional demand letter from Morrison & Foerster, the firm representing the National Abortion Federation in its suit against David Daleiden and the Center for Medical Progress.
In one video leaked to the public by Got News – believed to be taped on April 7, 2014, at the annual National Abortion Federation meeting – an abortion panel discusses burning the bodies of aborted babies for energy.
One panelist admits:
“[I]t’s a PR nightmare for us. If we end up being the front page of the paper, ‘Fetuses are being used for energy.’ I mean–I think it’s a great idea, but…”
The staff member – her exact position and title is unclear from the footage – is from Canada. She is the one who brings up using “fetuses for energy” to the NAF panel. (The discussion starts at 14:59 in the video above.) She speaks of personally “having to deal with a big sort of explosion of the incineration of fetal and stillbirths being used in waste-to-energy facility.” The woman explains:
But we’re, we are as well. So we’re all linked probably to Stericycle as well. So our hospital in Canada, we contract out, and it’s going down to Portland, and Portland is a waste-to-energy facility. … But it potentially presents a lot of challenges for us, not just logistically and legally, but also politically. Because now the NHS of course, you know the hospitals, they were ordered that they’re not supposed to dispose of their fetal remains outside the whole–I don’t know what they’re gonna do.
According to one abortion staff member present, it’s more than just a “great idea” to abortion advocates. It’s actually already happened.
This material was turned over by Congressional whistleblowers not subject to the court order.
Innocent human beings are being targeted for death, ripped from the only home they have ever known, and collected piece by piece. Then, some of them are being transported by the very ones who kill them to facilities that turn them into energy. And while this happens, the abortion industry applauds and refuses to have a completely honest discussion with the public.
This information leads to a horrifying question: Is my home powered by it – by them? Is yours?
The first video in our extensive series investigating Hillary Clinton’s campaign was released by Time magazine.
Given Hillary’s history going all the way back to Arkansas with her husband . . . Whitewater, Travelgate, Chinagate, Monica, Benghazi, Emailgate, etc . . . we assumed her campaign would be an easy target to expose malfeasance and wrongdoing to win an election.
What we found was that her team was on alert for our investigative journalists and even banned one undercover reporter from her offices.
But that didn’t stop us.
Uncovered in this first video is the Clinton campaign skirting election laws by deploying a voter registration effort to pre-select Pro-Hillary voters BEFORE they were asked to register to vote.
In a response to Project Veritas Action last week, the Clinton campaign told Time that its policy is to “register all voters, regardless of their preference in candidates.”
Yet paid organizer Sarah Sterner was caught instructing staffers to ask potential supporters
In the world of campaigning, it’s considering skirting the law and contradicts Hillary’s public statements.
(Breitbart) – Sunday on CNN’s “State of the Union,” Republican presidential candidate Ben Carson defended his comments about the possibility of using drones at the Mexican border in a heated exchange with guest host CNN’s Jim Acosta.
“It is quite clear what I said, I was border? I said that drones are excellent for surveillance. You know, along that border. We have miles and miles, and, you know… So drones can help with the surveillance, and no way did I suggest that drones be used to kill people. And I said that to the media at the time. I said you guys, some of you are going to to be saying that Carson wants to use drones to kill people on the border, and how ridiculous, and I hope that at some point we have responsible media to focus on the problem. We have a huge security risk there.”
When Acosta asked about drone strikes on the cartels Carson said, “That is a total lie. I said that. a drone could be used to destroy is the caves used to hide people.”
Acosta continued to push causing Carson him to say (in a Reagan way):
“Please, please. read my lips and listen carefully to what I am saying. I said that there are caves. There are caves that they utilize, and those caves can be eliminated. There are a number of possibilities, and that could be one of them. I am not talking about killing people. No people with drones.”