Apr 102014

For Cliven Bundy ‘To Prevent Another Ruby Ridge or Waco”…

Press release:

Coalition of Western State Legislators, Sheriffs, and Veterans Stand Vigil in Support of Embattled Nevada Rancher, Cliven Bundy ‘To Prevent Another Ruby Ridge or Waco”

A Delegation of state legislators, lead by Washington State Representative Matt Shea, along with a delegation of current serving Sheriffs, lead by Sheriff Richard Mack of the Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association, and military and police members of Oath Keepers, are converging on the site of a stand-off between federal law enforcement and Nevada Rancher Cliven Bundy, to prevent bloodshed and to stand in defense of hardworking rural Americans who are under assault by a runaway federal government.

cops vs ranchers son

LAS VEGAS, NV, April 10, 2014

The Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association (CSPOA.org), led by retired Arizona Sheriff Richard Mack, and the Oath Keepers organization (oathkeepers.org) are assisting Washington State Representative Matt Shea in organizing a delegation of current serving Western state legislators and Sheriffs to travel to the site of a tense stand-off between Bunkerville, Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy and the Bureau of Land Management (BLM). The delegation is traveling to Nevada to support a coalition of current serving Nevada legislators being organized by Nevada State Assemblywoman Michele Fiore, of Las Vegas, to stand vigil at the Bundy ranch to prevent Federal Government provocation of violence resulting in another Ruby Ridge or Waco type incident. They also hope that their example of oath-sworn public servants defending the rights of the people will prompt Clark County, Nevada Sheriff Douglas Gillespie and Nevada Governor Brian Sandoval to honor their oaths of office by taking real action to defend the rights of the Bundy family, the rights of all Nevadans, and the sovereignty of the State of Nevada.

Rancher Derrel Spencer speaks during a rally in support of Cliven Bundy near Bunkerville Nev. Monday, April 7, 2014, 2014 (AP):

Rancher Derrel Spence

Yesterday, April 9, 2014, Nevada State Assemblywoman Michele Fiore served the first watch in this vigil shortly after Cliven Bundy’s son, Ammon Bundy, was tazered by BLM “Rangers” during a heated confrontation.

“To that end, I have advised the BLM that such conduct is offensive to me and countless others and that the ‘First Amendment Area’ should be dismantled immediately,” Sandoval said. “No cow justifies the atmosphere of intimidation which currently exists nor the limitation of constitutional rights that are sacred to all Nevadans. The BLM needs to reconsider its approach to this matter and act accordingly.”

The video of that confrontation can be seen here:

Ranch Riot!! Bundy Ranch Protesters Tasered by Federal Agents and Attacked by K9′:

Protestors at the Bundy Ranch in Bunkerville, Nevada take on the Feds and stand their ground.

Read ENTIRE article…

Featured image thanks to The Blaze‘Feds Taser Pro-Nevada Rancher Protester During Clash’

Mar 132014

We’ve finally gotten to the point where Congress had to pass a law to make sure that the laws they pass are enforced.

In a speech that Representative Trey Gowdy really shouldn’t have had to make, he explains angrily to the Congress what its job is, and to Obama what his job is. Members were heard to applaud as he reached the crescendo.

Five Democrats joined Republicans in passing a bill that directs Obama to follows the laws – clearing the House by a 233 to 181 vote.

“How does going from being a senator to a president rewrite the Constitution?” Gowdy asked. “What’s different from when he was a senator? Mr. Speaker, I don’t think there’s an amendment to the Constitution that I’ve missed. I try to keep up with those with regularity.”


~ Source 1

~ Source 2

Mar 092014

MUST Hear Sarah’s ‘Uncle Sam’ :)

Palin Re-Writes Dr. Seuss: ‘I Do Not Like This Uncle Sam, I Do Not Like His Health Care Scam’

The first video is Palin Re-Writes Dr. Seuss:

“I do not like this Uncle Sam. I do not like his health care scam. I do not like — oh, just you wait — I do not like these dirty crooks, or how they lie and cook the books. I do not like when Congress steals, I do not like their crony deals. I do not like this spying, man, I do not like, ‘Oh, Yes we can.’ I do not like this spending spree, we’re smart, we know there’s nothing free. I do not like reporters’ smug replies when I complain about their lies. I do not like this kind of hope, and we won’t take it, nope, nope, nope.”

Sarah’s Speech in FULL:

Patriots get the youth registered in droves! Its how he did it and the Young Republicans are a new breed, proud of them! ~ JP

Mar 062014

RT news anchor Liz Wahl resigned on air yesterday, saying, “I cannot be part of a network that whitewashes the actions of Putin. I am proud to be an American and believe in disseminating the truth and that is why after this newscast I’m resigning.”

RT is, of course, entirely funded by the Russian government. I have been a guest on the network a few times but stopped over six months ago for essentially the same reasons Liz Wahl cited in her own resignation: RT has an editorial slant designed to protect the interests of Russia, not the United States of America.

And yet, at the same time, most of the U.S. media isn’t interested in protecting the United States of America, either. Instead, nearly all the media giants exist solely to protect the interests of powerful corporations: weapons manufacturers, GMO seed companies, vaccine manufacturers, pharmaceutical factories, corporatized agriculture and junk food giants.

Liz Wahl said she could no longer be “part of a network that whitewashes the actions of Putin.”

* U.S. journalists are whitewashing all the important issues in America

Mar 062014

Pat Toomey praised Sen Ted Cruz and talked about the victory in the US Senate when the nomination of Debo Adegbile was defeated. Toomey talked aout how David Faulker was killed by Mumia Abu-Jamal in 1981.
Toomey led the charge against confirming Debo Adegbile as assistant attorney general for the Department of Justice’s Civil Rights Division because of his work on a past case for the NAACP. The push led to the first rejection of an Obama nominee since Senate Democrats changed filibuster rules on nominees, lowering the threshold to 51 votes.

“I knew I could not let that stand without a fight,” he said.

“This is not at all about the principle that every defendant deserves a competent attorney,” he said. “This was always about the principle that no one should be able to make a mockery of the criminal justice system, fan the flames of racial strife in America, join a dishonest international anti-American campaign, along the way drag the family of a fallen police officer through three decades of hell and then be confirmed to a high post of the Justice Department.”

Toomey joked that when Vice President Joe Biden walked into the Senate chamber it was the “best news I’d had in a month” because that meant Democrats weren’t sure they would have the votes to confirm him.

Dec 092013

Can you imagine participating in a protest outside the White House and forcing the entire U.S. government to resign? Can you imagine a group of randomly chosen private citizens rewriting the U.S. constitution to include measures banning corporate fraud? It seems incomprehensible in the U.S., but Icelanders did just that. Guardian

So WE would overthrow (appealing) but NOT rewrite our Constitution. We want it enforced. Period! This admin does not want this known how it was done in Iceland and no wonder. I heard this on talk radio last night and now I ask YOU to share this with all Constitutional Conservatives. And it takes talk radio and bloggers to expose what happened!

Mirrored from: “Icelanders Overthrow Gov’t and Rewrite Constitution”

Socialist and Marxist blogs here in the U.S. say that there’s been a massive U.S. news conspiracy and cover up about the revolution in Iceland because the U.S. media is controlled by corporations, including banks, and the “powers that be” don’t want U.S. citizens getting any ideas to stage a revolution of their own.

From Blogger the Truthseeker:

iReport” on CNN, written by a private citizen in May 2012, has questioned the reasons why this revolution has not been widely covered in the U.S., suggesting that perhaps the mainstream media is controlled by large corporate interests and thus has been unwilling to report on Iceland’s activities. That report is currently making its way around social media. CNN today placed a statement on its website saying:

Dec. 2, 2013: We’ve noticed this iReport is being shared widely on Facebook and Twitter. Please note that this article was posted in May 2012. CNN has not yet verified the claims and we’re working to track down the original writer.
- dsashin, CNN iReport producer

Seems CNN JUST noticed this, after nearly TWO years!

How come we hear everything that happens in Egypt but no news about what’s happening in Iceland:


The pots and pans revolution in Iceland was not covered by mainstream U.S. media. In fact, any information about this revolution is found only on international newspapers, blogs and online documentaries, not on mainstream front-page articles as would be expected from news organizations covering a story of this magnitude.

The New York Times published a small handful of piecemeal stories, blogs and opinion pieces, but mostly glossed over the main narrative by saying the 2008 financial collapse in Iceland caused “mayhem far beyond the country’s borders” rather than pointing out that Icelanders took to the streets with pots and pans and forced their entire government to resign.

In Iceland, the people has made the government resign, the primary banks have been nationalized, it was decided to not pay the debt that these created with Great Britain and Holland due to their bad financial politics and a public assembly has been created to rewrite the constitution.

Truthseeker Continues:

Besides CNN Europe’s own coverage of the scandal, the events in Iceland were widely covered by international media and are easily verified by a simple search on Google which leads to a variety of reputable international news sources that ran numerous stories on the Icelandic revolution. A whole documentary has been made on the governmental overthrow called Pots, Pans and Other Solutions, and now, the conversation is focused on whether or not the citizens’ actions actually worked to make Iceland a more equitable nation.

To understand the enormity of what happened in Iceland, it’s best to draw parallels between the initial banking fraud that caused Iceland’s economy to collapse and the banking fraud in the U.S. that caused the mortgage crisis six years ago. In Iceland, unscrupulous bankers had inflated the value of Iceland’s banks internationally which in turn caused the “bubble” to eventually burst in 2008 and saw most of Iceland’s banks going bankrupt.


* A similar situation happened in the U.S. just one year before the collapse in Iceland, with the mortgage crisis of 2007.

* Is it possible that mainstream media sources purposely covered up the Iceland story to appease their corporate sponsors? It doesn’t seem likely, and yet, what explanation could be given as to why this news never made it to the front pages of our most trusted media organizations here in the U.S.?

* The real question, though, is why weren’t U.S. citizens given the information about the ousting of the Icelandic government and the jailing of the unscrupulous bankers? Are journalists in control of the mainstream media or is there some truth to accusations that big business may, in fact, be strong-arming reporters to keep quiet about world events that could inspire similar actions here in the U.S.?

Full piece…

See: * A TRUE History Lesson The Bill of Rights Versus the US Constitution

Dec 032013

…Affordable Care Act

obama does not respect the restraints the Constitution demands him to:

I have come to admire Michael & will now follow him closely after this hearing. The following are highlights of his testimony:

Article II, Section 3 of the U.S. Constitution, to which every president swears an oath, commands that the president “shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed.”3 Fealty to this duty is essential for maintaining our system of government and public order.

On obamcare…

* Since he signed the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) into law on March 23, 2010, President Barack Obama has failed to execute that law faithfully.

* The president has unilaterally taken taxpayer dollars made available by the PPACA and diverted them from their congressionally authorized purposes toward purposes for which no Congress has ever appropriated funds.

* He has unilaterally and repeatedly rewritten the statute to dispense taxpayer dollars that no federal law authorizes him to spend and that the PPACA expressly forbids him to spend.

* He has unilaterally issued blanket waivers to requirements that the PPACA does not authorize him to waive.

* At the same time he has declined to collect taxes the PPACA orders him to collect, he has unilaterally rewritten the statute to impose billions of dollars in taxes that the PPACA expressly forbids him to impose, and to incur billions of dollars in debt that the statute expressly forbids him to incur.

* He has unilaterally rewritten the PPACA to allow health insurance products that the statute expressly forbids. He has encouraged consumers, insurers, and state officials to violate a federal law he enacted.

He has taken these steps for the purpose of forestalling democratic action by the people’s elected representatives in Congress.

President Obama’s unfaithfulness to the PPACA is so wanton, it is no longer accurate to say the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act is “the law of the land.”

Diverting Prevention Funds to Federal Exchanges

Washington Post reported, “The Obama administration plans to use $454 million in Prevention Fund dollars to help pay for the federal health insurance exchange. That’s 45 percent of the $1 billion in Prevention Fund spending available [in 2013].”4 Senator Tom Harkin (D-IA) attacked the administration’s attempt “to redirect that money to educating the public about the new health insurance marketplaces” as “a violation of both the letter and spirit of this landmark law.”

Illegal Subsidies to Members of Congress

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, after the effective date of this subtitle, the only health plans that the Federal Government may make available to members of Congress and congressional staff with respect to their service as a member of Congress or congressional staff shall be health plans that are created under this act…or offered through an exchange established under this act…

Even after the Exchanges take full effect, this provision as written continues to strip members and staff of the “contribution” the federal government makes toward the premiums of those who participate in the FEHBP.

Obama once again unilaterally rewrote federal law to give nearly every member of Congress and congressional staffer an illegal subsidy of $5,000 to $11,000 per year.12 Faithfully executing the law would have required the president to let the OPM’s ruling stand, and let Congress address the matter through legislation.

Spending Billions That the PPACA Expressly Forbids the President to Spend

The president’s most egregious violation of his duty to execute faithfully the PPACA is his attempt — under the rubric of that law — to tax, borrow, and spend billions of dollars that statute expressly prohibits him to spend.

Nevertheless, shortly after legal scholars brought this feature of the law to the public’s attention in 2011,17 the Internal Revenue Service proposed a rule that would issue those subsidies — and impose the resulting taxes — through federal Exchanges as well as state-established Exchanges.

My friend, Mr. Simon Lazarus, who is also on this panel, has defended the president’s actions.

Unilateral, Blanket Waivers of the PPACA’s Requirements

The president has unilaterally and without authority altered the PPACA’s effective dates by issuing blanket exemptions from both the PPACA’s employer mandate and many of its health insurance regulations.

* Declining to Collect Taxes the PPACA Imposes

* Imposing Taxes the PPACA Does Not Authorize

Even more troubling, President Obama is threatening to impose hundreds of billions of dollars in taxes Congress never authorized on millions of employers and individual taxpayers.

Forestalling Democratic Action

Underlying each of these instances in which President Obama has unilaterally rewritten federal law is an unmistakable desire to forestall democratic action by the people’s elected representatives in Congress.

If the president had not raided the Prevention and Public Health Fund, then federal Exchanges might be even less prepared to offer coverage in 2014 than they are now, which almost certainly would have prompted Congress to reopen the PPACA.


The concerns I share with you today are not borne of partisanship. Though I have worked for Republicans, I am not a Republican.

This president’s failure — or any president’s failure — to honor his constitutional duty to execute the laws faithfully is not a partisan issue.

* FULL testimony

* Truth in Testimony Disclosure form

I encourage you to follow Michael. TY Michael for speaking the independent thoughts. You spoke for so many of us.~ JP

Nov 202013

We absolutely LOVE how quick witted and funny he is :) Not to mention his dance moves. Close to 20 m of greatness.

President George W. Bush on having painting as a pastime…

President George W. Bush gives Jay a portrait he painted himself…

President George W. Bush on his work with wounded veterans.

He says he didn’t behave that well and he feels it contributed to his heart issues :) Jay Leno flies down to the golf outing for wounded vets.

President George W. Bush shows off his dance moves in Africa…


Nov 202013

This is the video of the Hearing and I would like to personally thank Rep. Collins for posting it this morning, it IS the panel saying No, No, No and NO!