Bubba’s legal hires advising obviously…
NOTE: The Examiner and Before its News also covering this. But the Daily Mail has never failed me and covers it 110%!
It is important to read what State Run Media is up to in regards to obama bias ahead of the debate tomorrow after this Hillary Revelation…
Official version: The State Department says the attack on the Benghazi compound was not preceded by protests
CAUSE OF ATTACK WAS NOT BASED ON FILM PROTESTS:
The State Department says it never concluded that the attack was simply a protest gone awry.
See: One scheduled witness, Eric Nordstrom, the former chief security officer for U.S. diplomats in Libya, told the committee his pleas for more security were ignored.
Department officials were asked about the administration’s initial – and since retracted – explanation linking the violence to protests over an American-made anti-Muslim video circulating on the Internet.
One official responded ‘that was not our conclusion’ and called it a question for ‘others’ to answer, without specifying to whom he was referring. In that interview, Nordstrom said he sent two cables to State Department headquarters in March 2012 and July 2012 requesting additional diplomatic security agents for Benghazi, but he received no responses.
He stated that Charlene Lamb, the deputy assistant secretary for international programs, wanted to keep the number of U.S. security personnel in Benghazi artificially low.
See: the FIVE memos
* Blaming the CIA
* Announcement of State Department dissent from rest of Obama administration could help protect Clinton during 2016 presidential run
* Obama administration originally said assault stemmed from protests against anti-Islam video but then backtracked saying terrorists responsible
* Officials tell how ambassador Chris Stevens was trapped in safe-room as assailants burnt the compound down
* AK-47s, grenade attacks, and a smoke-filled safe-room – chilling account of the death of U.S. ambassador Chris Stevens revealed
* Ambassador’s whereabouts after attack not known until officials rang his cell phone – and found doctors trying unsuccessfully to save his life in hospital
The State Department has said that it never believed the September 11th attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi was the result of a protest over an anti-Islam movie – directly contracting the rest of the Obama administration.
By trying to distance her department from the inept and deceptive handling of the Benghazi attack
Clinton reveals what REALLY led to Benghazi Massacre:
The State Department’s insistence it never bought the story – expressed by the White House and Susan Rice, U.S. ambassador to the United Nations – that a crude anti-Islam film made in California triggered the attack gives ammunition against Obama both to the Romney campaign and congressional Republicans.
State Department sources have said that Clinton has never forgotten that Rice, who served in her husband Bill’s administration, was an early supporter of Obama. Rice has ambitions to take over from Clinton if Obama is re-elected but the Benghazi debacle could scupper her chances.
In a briefing on Tuesday, State Department officials said ‘others’ in the executive branch concluded initially that the attack was part of a protest against the film, which ridiculed the Prophet Muhammad. That was never the State Department’s conclusion, reporters were told.
~ Clinton and Rice are rivals.
* See Agent Sean Smith died in desperate battle to save ambassador
The surviving members of the compound have now described the overnight attack, (Riveting details), which saw agents trapped in the burning compound before finally speeding away.
In a slash piece of lying innuendos, titled No Shame, which btw does not even have an author brave enough to give it his byline. It’s kinda, sorta like listening to an Anonymous. At least back it up if you want to defend obama and blame the GOP for your lie.
The ugly truth is that the same people who are accusing the administration of not providing sufficient security for the American consulate in Benghazi have voted to cut the State Department budget, which includes financing for diplomatic security. The most self-righteous critics don’t seem to get the hypocrisy, or maybe they do and figure that if they hurl enough doubts and complaints at the administration, they will deflect attention from their own poor judgments on the State Department’s needs.
In the hearing on October 10th Dana Rohrabacher on questioning Lamb from the State Dept. on this very issue. Her reply? NO!
So the ‘opinion’ piece from the NYT today is JUST that an opinion piece, that budget cuts were responsible for Benghazi attack. See they are playing ‘Deflect’. The NYT, obama’s mouthpieces are trying one way or another to blame Republicans. So this blatantly shows SRM endorsing obama. And here at JUST Piper we are calling you out on that lie.
Here is the TRUTH:
And this JUST in today. We know how Raddatz joined Biden in the debate against Paul Ryan. That is established. But now we have Candy Crowley (CNN) defying the rules set out by the commission on debate rules in a ‘townhall’ setting.
This from left leaning Huff Po:
In a rare show of unity, both the Obama and Romney campaigns have complained to the Commission on Presidential Debates about CNN’s Candy Crowley, who will moderate Tuesday’s town hall forum.
The reason, according to Time’s Mark Halperin, is that Crowley (an obama minion) has publicly said that she intends to play an active role in the debate, rather than just let the audience at the town hall ask questions.
Stressing the TIMES article:
As Crowley put it last week, “Once the table is kind of set by the town-hall questioner, there is then time for me to say, ‘Hey, wait a second, what about X, Y, Z?’”
In the view of the two campaigns and the commission, those and other recent comments by Crowley conflict with the language the campaigns agreed to, which delineates a more limited role for the debate moderator. The questioning of the two candidates is supposed to be driven by the audience members — likely voters selected by the Gallup Organization. (Which btw are chosen from a Blue state- NY!) And guess what? Crowley gets to ‘choose’ the questions herself. More SRM representing 0bama.
IMO obama wants the questions on Benghazi deflected, enter Crowley. And although it is being spouted by the SRM that obama will nail Romney on Bain, I personally believe THAT is a distraction meant to throw Mitt off his game. I betchya that Bain will not be tallied or the 47%.
Yes, obama will get nasty and with the help of Crowley and CNN. I want to ‘verify’ the names of those asking the ‘questions’, to insure Crowley is not fabricating in a pre-plan with this administration! We can only hope it gets the same negative reaction that Raddatz and Biden received. Hopefully, prayerfully, obama will lose even more of the women’s vote. Romney needs to make sure he injects the admin doesn’t know what Clinton is doing and that Clinton is saying it is obama. If Mitt is armed with that and Dana’s questioning of Lamb, he will be the one to score points. If Crowley in fact will be going rogue, then Mitt has double the work to make sure his points are heard and not be decimated as with Raddatz and Biden.
But that’s JUST my opinion…~ JP