Mar 112012

ht/ PF

John Murtagh speaks to Fox and Friends about the attempted bombing of his home as a child by Bill Ayers’ terrorist group Weather Underground.

See: You Don’t Need A Weatherman To Know Which Way The Wind Blows by clicking image

Mar 112012

Updated 3/10/12 More additions, thanks to Sophie who has kept me very busy. Thanks also to Gabriel for tracking Insurance, Government and Healthcare Resignations.

From American Kabuki:

Abbreviations used:

CEO = Chief Executive Officer
CFO = Chief Financial Officer
CIO = Chief Investment Officer
COO = Chief Operating Officer
INC = Incorporated (can be private held or publically traded shares)
PLC = Public Limited Company (publicly traded shares can be listed or unlisted on stock market)
LTD = Limited Company (privately held)
LLC = American version of LTD, but can have a shareholder/member that is an INC, often hybrids of both
AG = German version of PLC
AB = Swedish version of PLC
SA = Society Anonymous in various latin languages – same as PLC
NV = Dutch version of PLC
BV = Dutch version of LTD
LP = Limited Partners (partnership with limited liability)

JUST a sample:

— 2011

1. 9/01/11 (USA NY) Bank of New York Mellon Chief Robert P. Kelly Resigns in a Shake-UP

5. 9/14/11 (USA NJ) Columbia Bank CEO Raymond G. Hallock Announces Retirement

16. 10/03/11 (USA FL) Quantek Opportunity Fund, portfolio manager Javier Guerra. Arbitration awarded $1 million damages to Aris Multi-Strategy Fund. Quantek Asset Management made false statements to Aris.

21. 21. 10/14/11 (USA TX) Deutsche Bank Investment Advisor Griffin Perry resigns, SEC regulations prevented him from campaigning for his father Rick Perry’s Presidential campaign.

~ So we opine that Rick waited to throw his hat in the ring until this was done.

34. 11/04/11 (USA NY) MF Global, Jon Corzine, stepped down as chairman and CEO, hired criminal attorney to represent him.

46. 12/03/11 (USA SC) South Carolina’s $25 billion pension fund chief investor Robert Borden resigned. Borden’s resignation comes as the SC Retirement System faces a $13 billion deficit, prompting state lawmakers to call for a massive overhaul of the system.

~ Interesting Group resigned together ALL on the same day…

58. 12/23/11 (USA VA) Virginia National Bank (VNB) Chairman Mark Giles quits

59. 12/23/11 (USA VA) Virginia National Bank (VNB) Board Member Claire Gargalli quits

60. 12/23/11 (USA VA) Virginia National Bank (VNB) Board Member Leslie Disharoon quits

61. 12/23/11 (USA VA) Virginia National Bank (VNB) Board Member Neal Kassell quits

NOTE: Something is not sitting right here with me on the Timothy Geitner connection. Anyone?

71. 1/09/12 (USA WASHINGTON DC) Whitehouse former banker and Chief of Staff William M. Daley resigned

See I researched Daley. You will find Daley’s tactics here

Lookie this what I dug up in my old files:

J. Appoint William S. Daley Secretary of Commerce, Clinton’s 1992 Illinois Campaign

Manager, who appears to have been involved in questionable activities in the Chicago area

involving fraud, the IRS and the FBI ( The lawsuit

against Daley and his firm Daley and George, which dragged on for 5 years, (1992-1997)

was suddenly dropped by the ‘prosecutor’ exactly one month after Daley was sworn in as

Secretary of Commerce on 1/31/97. Also, he may have misrepresented himself in his

Senate confirmation hearings. Mr. Daley is/was a partner in the international law firm of

Mayer, Brown & Platt where he was “concentrating in the area of corporate and

government relations matters” (paid lobbyist?). The firm has offices in Moscow and

Beijing, with emphasis on Communist China. If he is still a partner, on leave of absence or

not, he is benefiting from the firm’s dealings with China and Russia.

- source

— 2012

* Look to the date of 2/05/12 104 and 105. Many on the list represent the same companies and their resignations JUST happened to be on the same day. I’m willing to bet the farm that many of these listed are in some way tied to the gangster thugs from Chicago. Somehow , someway, But despite all the citizen journalists the extensive research will barely match what Gretchen Glass (alias) did writing Presidential Treason 101-105. Which btw have all suspiciously disappeared from a search except for 101. Domains that carried it have conveniently disappeared. But dare I say I have a disk with them? OR will I see a bad ‘end’? Until a few years ago it was readily available!

My aha moment after being relentless:

The stage is set. . . It’s time to connect more dots . . .. But alas, William Bova’s site is now gone also. JUST look what happens when you click on links here.

“Presidential Treason 101″

Presidential Treason 102




You must take the time to read all five. We never surmised WHO Greatchen was, but we knew back in 1999 these were documents not meant to be seen. Save the pages if you can. But do not miss the complicated weave that began in the Clinton administration, that has lead to what we have seen happen to our country! My money is on the fact many on this list are somehow contained in the PTs. ~ JP

Thanks to American Kabuki and Gabriel for compiling this list. I’ve not seen this type of research with ALL government and news reports backed links since the Downside Legacy by Alamo Girl and the PTs.

Complete list of all 254


It is not known under what circumstances these individuals have left their positions, I make no judgement on that. I find the timing of so many resignations extremely curious and a temporal marker in history of high significance. No one should assume I make any judgement about the character of these people. I frankly don’t know their reputations except for a few rather famous ones.

This list includes Banks, Investment Houses, Sovereign Wealth Funds, Equity Funds, Savings Retirement Funds and other shadow banking organizations. The line is very blurry between these entities, some are owned by banks some are banks, some invest in banks as well as owning entire industries (common in Hong Kong and Japan).

Ok. As we are literally days away from the global financial meltdown just look at what is being broadcast on MAINSTREAM media!

Geithner Is A Criminal! So How Is It He COULD Face Criminal Charges?

This adds serious credibility to Ben Fulford who wrote last week that Geithner was arrested and released. Before this broadcast even I was skeptical of the Fulford report but now it all seems very possible if not likely.

Although the topic of this report may be stunning for those of you who are still asleep, the REAL revelation in what happened in this broadcast was not the exposure of Tim Geithner but rather what Shep Shepard gives up in a TOTAL MSM mental lapse at 3:40.

“It’s clear that the banks run the country…the country doesn’t run itself.”

If you think this is no big deal then think again. This is a HUGE webbot hit for Clif High as he’s been talking about someone in the Mainstream Media having a mental lapse and saying something that was actually TRUE. Not only that but others in the MSM pick up on it and continue the discussion. Admitting that “the banks run the country” is a huge whack to the hornets nest.

by 2012sprint

4-minute corporate news show. American Kabuki list the daily-increasing bank resignations. David Wilcock and Benjamin Fulford explain and document history and deceit at the top of US and global finance, leading to current and imminent arrests.

This adds serious credibility to Ben Fulford who wrote last week that Geithner was arrested and released. Before this broadcast even I was skeptical of the Fulford report but now it all seems very possible if not likely.

- by johannas58

Geithner arrested? 116 major bank resignations? What The Finance is this?

Mar 112012

Republican primary voters will go to the polls Tuesday in Alabama and Mississippi, while Hawaii and American Samoa hold their presidential caucuses. For Mitt Romney this “southern swing” is an important test, as the former Massachusetts governor works to fight off criticism that he doesn’t connect with folks in dixie. Newt Gingrich, a former house speaker from Georgia, is polling well in Mississippi and hopes to put the momentum back in his campaign. Rick Santorum is also campaigning aggressively down south. Ron Paul continues to pursue his strategy of focusing on winning delegates over states.

Sunday the Alabama Republican Party workers were busy cutting tickets, contacting campaign representatives and notifying the media of important information regarding their presidential forum. The party is hosting the forum Monday, March 12 at the Alabama Theater in downtown Birmingham. The doors opened at 3:30p.m. and the forum began at 5:30p.m.

Newt Gingrich and Rick Santorum are, so far, the only two candidates to sign on for the event. Mitt Romney’s campaign gave a “maybe” and Ron Paul declined the invitation. The pair site scheduling conflicts as the reason for not coming to Birmingham Monday. The state republican party’s executive director, T.J. Maloney, said they haven’t given up on getting the men to attend. “we’re in touch with both of their campaigns, asking them if they can’t change their travel schedules to make them available.”

Maloney says this forum is very important to the state and the people casting their ballots Tuesday. “Alabama voters liked to be asked for their votes.” He said, “that’s why it was so important to remove Alabama from the March 6th Super Tuesday and have a stand alone primary.” Legislators pushed back the state’s primary a week to bring in more campaigning focus. Instead of getting lost in the shuffle, Alabama and Mississippi are on the radars of candidates.

Monday’s forum will not be a debate. Each candidate will have 20 minutes to talk to voters, in hopes of swaying their votes. Following their “closing arguments,” there will be a short question-and-answer segment with a small panelist. The forum is free and open to the public. However, seating is limited to 2,000. If you want to get inside, the Maloney suggests getting there early. ABC 33/40 will be streaming it live, here, on our website.

Mar 112012

by Joel B. Pollak

The revelation of the relationship between President Barack Obama and the late Critical Race Theory professor Derrick Bell sheds light not only on Obama’s past beliefs, but his present governing philosophy, particularly at the Department of Justice.

It is interesting, for example, to reconsider Attorney General Eric Holder’s incendiary statement in 2009 that America is a “nation of cowards” with a view towards the influence of Bell’s ideas on Obama’s cohort of left-wing legal minds.

In his speech, Holder expressed a brazen skepticism of the concept of America as a “melting pot,” seeing that as a form of self-deception. Despite the achievements of the civil rights struggle, Holder argued, racism and segregation had in some ways increased:

Given all that we as a nation went through during the civil rights struggle it is hard for me to accept that the result of those efforts was to create an America that is more prosperous, more positively race conscious and yet is voluntarily socially segregated.

Holder’s contradictory ideas—celebrating “positive” race consciousness while decrying continued segregation—are a tempered though familiar version of Bell’s radical idea that the civil rights movement had, in many ways, entrenched white supremacy in America.

To Bell, racial equality—whether in the law or the academy—was a myth. The civil rights movement had been largely futile, because racism was deeply ingrained in American institutions. The answer—though not the solution—was continued resistance.

Bell therefore celebrated those, like Louis Farrakhan, who were “willing and able to ‘tell it like it is’ regarding who is responsible for racism in this country.”

Holder appeared to echo Bell’s rhetorical posture in his provocative challenge to a “nation of cowards,” confronting the very legal system he had just been appointed to manage and defend. And Holder has displayed similar skepticism towards civil rights laws by enforcing them unequally, often treating black civil rights violators differently than white ones.

The most famous instance of such discrimination is the New Black Panther voter intimidation case, which was dropped by Holder despite the fact that it was an open-and-shut case involving serious violations of voting rights.

Bell Answers Rodney King: No, We Will Never Get Along

Obama: “Open your hearts and open your minds to the words of Prof. Derrick Bell.”

In a 1992 MacNeil/Lehrer Newshour Broadcast, Professor Derrick Bell says he doubts black and white people in America will ever get along:


~ Reminds me of Michelle Obama: “What we have learned over this year is that hope is making a comeback. It is making a comeback. And let me tell you something — for the first time in my adult lifetime, I am really proud of my country.”

And Obama’s ‘Apology’ Tour Sep 23, 2009 is legendary:

And he has not STOPPED apologizing …

Aug 26, 2010…

Oct 13, 2011…

Mar 10, 2012…

THIS one is not to be missed!

Obama’s hypocrisy apologizing to the likes of Sandra Fluke not Fluk!

During the U.S. House of Representatives Session, Rep. Louie Gohmert (check list) addresses Obama’s so-called “Apology Tour”.

Kinda like this:

Remy crashes Sandra Fluke’s Congressional testimony to demand a mandate for his cough drop addiction.

Shows the ridiculousness that WE should pay for her BCP.


Yeah and listen up peeps, you better check the deal
We got another mandate we gone straight reveal
And if you don’t listen up, we be walking out
Yeah you know cough drops what we talking about

Take a look at this graph, you gonna holler with fear
Cough drops costing me a hundred dollars a year
I’m talking Halls, Ludens, to keep me alive
It’s like a dog-fighting ring, I need Vicks to survive

It’s preventative medicine, suppressing my cough? Word.
I need a vote from each of you–oh, that’s kind of awkward
Cough drops are so tasty–how is it allowed?
Yeah, this guy knows what I’m talking about.

Cherry, honey lemon, or the mentho-lyptus
Directly to my house’s where I suggest you ship this
They come in all kinds of colors and flavors galore
Even sheep sk–wait, I think this one’s yours

I appreciate the testimony, very profound
We need to verify this policy is morally sound
And there’s one reasonable way to see if it should be allowed
And it’s to probe you internally, can somebody get me a towel?

My apologies for the gentleman across the aisle
He doesn’t understand mandates, he hasn’t been here a while
I see no reason we shouldn’t pass your request
Just let me double check, yep, it passes our test

This is not about “men’s health,” this is not a prescription
Mandate Men’s Health, 12 month subscription
Your party has no respect for individual rights
Now come on up here, I’d like to check your insides

Well I guess it’s safe to say this has kind of devolved
Maybe it’s not the best idea to have these people involved
So I think I’m gonna bounce, put this one on the shelf
Hit up the drug store–get some cough drops myself.

Ever wonder who is booking Sandra Fluke — See the ‘AHA’ moment, it is Priceless…

Connecting the Dots: O’Reilly Traces Sandra Fluke to Former White House Adviser:

Obama? We JUST want to know :

Mar 112012

Background: Congress approves war, not presidents! Rep. Walter Jones, (R-NC) introduced H. Concurrent Resolution 107 ~ March 7, 2012

Almost every week brings a new reason for the United States House of Representatives to bring impeachment charges against President Obama. The question of the day is not why he should be impeached but why it hasn’t already been done.

This week it was Secretary of Defense Panetta’s declaration before the Senate Armed Services Committee that he and President Obama look not to the Congress for authorization to bomb Syria but to NATO and the United Nations. This led to Rep. Walter Jones, R-N.C., introducing an official resolution calling for impeachment should Obama take offensive action based on Panetta’s policy statement, because it would violate the Constitution.

h/t Video Char:

Obama Admin Cites ‘Int’l Permission,’ Not Congress, As ‘Legal Basis’ For Action In Syria:

Uploaded by SenatorSessions

WASHINGTON, March 7—Under question from Sen. Sessions at a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing today, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Gen. Martin Dempsey indicated that “international permission,” rather than Congressional approval, provided a ‘legal basis’ for military action by the United States.

See: Pentagon Launches Desperate Damage Control Over Shocking Panetta Testimony

Well, really, folks: Is Obama’s disregard of the Constitution really news? No. He has done it so many times it doesn’t make news anymore. Democrats approve it and Republicans in Congress appear to accept it – not all Republicans, of course, but far too many.

The list of Obama’s constitutional violations is growing by the day and ought to be the topic of not only nightly news commentary but citizens’ town-hall meetings and protest rallies.

President Obama can only be emboldened by the lack of impeachment proceedings. His violations typically arouse a short-lived tempest among some conservatives, yet impeachment is not generally advocated by his critics as a realistic recourse. That must change.

That Obama can be voted out of office in eight months is not a reason to hold back on impeachment. Formal impeachment proceedings in the House of Representatives would help alert the nation’s 120 million likely voters that more is at stake in Obama’s power grabs than Syrian human rights and contraception subsidies for college students.

The grounds for House impeachment proceedings have been laid by Obama’s own actions. A list of his unconstitutional and illegal actions would embarrass any honest public official and makes Nixon’s Watergate cover-up look like a college fraternity house panty raid.

Obama’s policy on the use of military force abroad raises grave issues – both policy issues and constitutional issues. When Defense Secretary Panetta tells a Senate committee he will rely on NATO and the U.N. for “permission” for use of military force, that is an affront to and direct assault on the Constitution.

Those Panetta statements propelled Rep. Jones to introduce a House resolution stipulating that any use of military force by the president without an act of Congress, except to repel a direct attack on the United States, is an impeachable offense under the Constitution.

But this is only the latest Obama assault on the Constitution. There are many other examples of Obama’s disregard for constitutional limitations to his power.

* Obama violated the Constitution with his “recess appointments” while the Senate was not in recess. It is up the Senate to decide when it is in recess, not the president. That distinction between executive and legislative authority is what the Separation of Powers doctrine is all about.

* Obama is an obvious participant and co-conspirator in Eric Holder’s approval and later cover-up of the illegal “Fast and Furious” gun-walking program. Unlike the Watergate case, people have actually died as a result of this illegal program.

* Obama undoubtedly has knowledge of and has approved Homeland Security Secretary Napolitano’s project to require Border Patrol management to falsify apprehension numbers on the southwest border. This is a clear violation of Article IV, Section 4 of the Constitution, which requires the federal government to protect the country against foreign invasion.

The president’s open refusal to enforce the Defense of Marriage Act is a violation of Article III, Section 1 of the Constitution, which does not authorize the president to choose which laws to “faithfully execute.” The oath taken by a new president on Inauguration Day does not say, “… to defend the Constitution of the United States… to the best of my ability except when I disagree with it.”

Did the president violate the law when he instructed Labor Secretary Solis to negotiate agreements with foreign governments to expand the “labor rights” of illegal aliens?

The precedent of Clinton’s impeachment over his perjury in the Monica Lewinsky case established the principle that the legal definition of “high crimes and misdemeanors” is what Congress wants them to mean. Have Obama’s actions met the constitutional standard for impeachment? Absolutely, yes.

Unless the House of Representatives acts to begin impeachment proceedings against this bold usurper, we are headed for dictatorship. Either the Constitution limits the president’s powers or it does not. If it does, Obama must be impeached for his actions. If not, then a dictatorship is not only inevitable, it will be upon us soon.


Mar 112012

On this day in history: Spain commuter trains bombed by al-Qaeda; Gorbachev becomes Soviet leader; Crosby, Stills, Nash and Young release “Deja Vu.”

On 11 March 2004, between 7:30 and 7:45 AM, ten bombs detonated in four different locations on Madrid’s C-2 commuter rail line at the height of the city’s morning rush hour. The bombs killed 190 people and wounded more than 1,500. Each train was carrying an estimated 700 people, with an average of 100 people in each passenger car.

On August 19th 1991, the Soviet people woke to news of an attempt to overthrow President Mikhail Gorbachev, the architect of “glasnost” and “perestroika”. The coup, led by the so-called “Gang of Eight”, brought Red Army tanks onto the streets of Moscow. Russian leader Boris Yeltsin led attempts to rebuff the coup plotters, and would go on to become the dominant force in Moscow as the Soviet Union crumbled and a restored Gorbachev lost his grip on power.