May 312010
 

~Thanks to Creeping Sharia Blog

U.S. Congressman Steve King Iowa’s Fifth Congressional District http://tinyurl.com/2u5cqgt

U.S. Rep. King: ACLU calls the shots at the Justice Department
5/28/2010

http://www.house.gov/steveking/

http://www.facebook.com/Rep.SteveKing

http://www.twitter.com/SteveKingIA

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE CONTACT: John Kennedy

May 28, 2010 Office: 202.226.2384

WASHINGTON, D.C. — Congressman Steve King (R-IA) today called upon Attorney General Eric Holder to immediately make the DOJ’s “draft complaint” challenging Arizona’s immigration law public.

“President Obama has ordered Attorney General Eric Holder to use the Department of Justice in an attempt to invalidate Arizona’s illegal-immigration enforcement law,” said King.

“The ACLU, SEIU and the Muslim American Society are calling the shots at the Justice Department. The ‘draft complaint’ DOJ has prepared to challenge the Arizona law is a ‘cut & paste’ version of the class-action lawsuit the ACLU filed in United States District Court on May 17th.

No other conclusion could be reached unless Holder releases the Department’s ‘draft complaint.’ But when it becomes public, all of America will know what I know today. The ACLU and their radical affiliates are dictating the policy of the White House and the Department of Justice.”

JUST read ALL the details…A good blogger does reference & Creeping Sharia is one of the best…

Share
May 312010
 

CFP By Doug Bronson

Isn’t it amazing the things that our going on today around the world, but much more concerning are what’s happening right here in our own country? I look around me every day and see things taking place that are absolutely appalling to me in their nature. I can’t for the life of me figure out the thinking or the reasoning behind most any of this, besides that their ultimate goal must be the destruction of our system of government put in place so many years ago by our Founding fathers, through our constitution.

With this being said, could someone please explain to me…..

Fannie, Freddie, and the Housing Collapse

To many of you this may be old news, but understand there are millions of “clueless” still out there with virtually no knowledge of any of this. What you’re aware of yourselves is vital to be passed along to others, and please do so. But Fannie and Freddie are still pertinent in many ways to the economic struggle we’re faced with as a country and look to be for quite awhile still. So let’s take a quick look back at these two mortgage companies, their involvement in the housing collapse, and some of the main players involved then that are still involved in them today.

Why do we keep blaming big business, the banks, Wall Street and all the other “capitalist” companies as the trouble with our economic system and as being evil? I understand corruption and greed did indeed take place, and in turn, contributed heavily to the economic hardships we’ve been enduring for the past couple of years. Plus, how we’re “preached” too constantly of the CEO’s exuberant salaries and bonuses. I got that part.

But there’s little to no mention of the salaries and bonuses of Fannie and Freddie’s executives, or why we want to reform private companies while Fannie and Freddie continue operating as always, all the while operating by taxpayer bailout with no cap in place.

The top 4 recipients of money from Fannie Mae in order of cash magnitude were:

1. Sen. Christopher Dodd (D-CT), the Chairman of the Senate Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee;
2. Sen. Barack Obama (D-IL), a member of the Federal Financial Management Committee and now our president;
3. Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY), Chairman of the Senate Finance Committee;
4. Rep. Barney Frank (D-MA), Chairman of the House Financial Services Committee.

JUST MUST read full article…

I PROMISE you ~ I JUST finished this & it IS all explained here! The Obama Deception HQ Full length version

…and HERE…

Fall of the Republic HQ full length version

Stay tuned later today or tomorrow for Part 1 of my expose, putting it all in one place for you…

January 24, 2010 — Barney Frank says now that he was never pushing for excessive homeownership, just renting homes, but now he is caught in his lies, as he pushed for home ownership.

In 2005, Frank said that there should be more homeownership and that there was no housing bubble. Now, look at the economy. Because of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac creating a bubble, under Barney Frank’s leadership, the economy is in recession.

September 26, 2008 — Democrats in their own words Covering up the Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac Scam that caused our Economic Crisis.

At a 2004 hearing see Democrat after Democrat covering up and attacking the regulations to protect Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac (their Cash Cows) that are now destroying our economy because the Democrats let them cheat.


Share
May 312010
 

Say What?! Smells like a Cover Up!

A California congressman who called it an “impeachable” offense for the administration to offer Rep. Joe Sestak a job in exchange for his quitting a Senate bid said Sunday the cover-up, as usual, appears worse than the crime.

Republican Rep. Darrell Issa said the explanation for the Sestak affair — that former President Bill Clinton offered the Democratic congressman an unpaid position on an advisory board if he would drop his challenge against party-switching Pennsylvania Sen. Arlen Specter — is not plausible because as a sitting congressman Sestak couldn’t have served on a presidential commission.

“It’s a crime because they’ve admitted that they offered this position … So that begs the real question. Do we believe this is a further cover-up because he’s — they’re now talking about a job that President Clinton himself should have known Sestak couldn’t take? ” he said.

“They’re now coming up with a nonplausible answer,” Issa said.

On Friday, the White House revealed that Obama Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel had asked Clinton to talk to Sestak about a presidential appointment if Sestak would suspend his bid for the Democratic Senate nomination.

Full article ~Good content

Share
May 312010
 

JoAnneMor http://tinyurl.com/2637oa4

As you know, the Deep Water Horizon has exploded in the Gulf of Mexico. It has been spewing oil from a ruptured wellpipe for over a month.

BP and the US Government has said they are trying everything possible to stop that multi million gallon oil from continuing to flow into the Gulf.

I am about to dispute that claim and offer an expose’ as to why that story about them doing everything possible is a lie and a profitable enterprise to those who would make money from this disaster.

The Top Kill method was started and suspended several times. It was being attempted only half heartedly. The reason is, there is no money to be made with a solution that simple.

The real money is in the use of dispersements.

http://www.nalco.com/

There is a company called NALCO. They make water purification systems and chemical dispersements.

NALCO is based in Chicago with subsidiaries in Brazil, Russia, India, China and Indonesia.

NALCO is associated with UChicago Argonne program. UChicago Argonne received $164 million dollars in stimulus funds this past year. UChicago Argonne just added two new executives to their roster. One from NALCO. The other from the Ill. Dept of Educaution.

If you dig a little deeper you will find NALCO is also associated with Warren Buffett, Maurice Strong, Al Gore, Soros, Apollo, Blackstone, Goldman Sachs, Hathaway Berkshire.

Warren Buffet /Hathaway Berkshire increased their holdings in NALCO just last November. (Timing is everything).

The dispersement chemical is known as Corexit. What it does is hold the oil below the water’s surface. It is supposed to break up the spill into smaller pools. It is toxic and banned in Europe.

NALCO says they are using older and newer versions of Corexit in the Gulf.. (Why would you need a newer version, if the old one was fine?)

There is big money and even bigger players in this scam. While they are letting the oil blow wide open into the Gulf, the stakes and profit rise.

The Dolphins, Whales, Manatees, Sea Turtles and fish suffocate and die. The coastal regions, salt marshes, tourist attractions and the shore front properties are being destroyed, possibly permanently.The air quality is diminished. The Gulf of Mexico fishing industry is decimated.

All to create a need for their expensive and extremely profitable poison.

Some friends and I have compiled extensive articles and reports to support this claim.

Thank you:

JUST read it all…

~ Friends, get THIS story circulating!

Share
May 312010
 

~Jihad Watch

Get the HIS-tory here…

NOT seen Video by only 300 people Gaza flotilla participants invoked killing of Jews

Share
May 302010
 


Gov. Jan Brewer has pushed aside the state’s attorney general in Arizona’s defense of its new law clamping down on illegal immigrants, accusing him of conspiring with the Obama administration as it considers whether to sue the state.

Gov. Jan Brewer has pushed aside Arizona Attorney General Terry Goddard in the state's defense of its new law clamping down on illegal immigrants. (AP)

Brewer issued a statement late Friday night saying her legal team will defend the state against lawsuits challenging the measure. She invoked a provision in the law to have private attorneys represent the state. They already are representing her in some of the legal challenges to the law that name her as a defendant.

But Arizona Attorney General Terry Goddard says Brewer can’t kick him off the case. Goddard’s top aide, Tim Nelson, said Saturday that Brewer can’t invoke the provision because it hasn’t taken effect yet and that there are constitutional questions.

“We have real concerns about the constitutionality of that,” Nelson said. “It’s an open question.”

Brewer’s decision came after Justice Department officials met with Goddard — a Democrat who will likely challenge Brewer, a Republican, in her re-election bid — before meeting with her legal team.

“For some inexplicable reason, the Department of Justice officials met with the Arizona attorney general hours before meeting with the state of Arizona’s legal team, and then allowed the attorney general to hold a press conference to discuss the meeting,” she said in the statement.

“This level of coordination between the attorney general and the Obama administration is disturbingly similar to the coordination with Democratic Congresswoman Gabrielle Gifford earlier this week on President Obama’s still unclear plan to deploy up to 1,200 National Guard troops to the border,” she said.

Justice officials told Goddard and later Brewer’s team that the Obama administration is prepared to go to court if necessary in a bid to block the new law, which takes effect July 29.

Full Article…

___________________________________

Opponents of AZ Immigration Law Guilty of Racial Profiling and Discrimination

Louisville Economic Policy ExaminerRob Binsrick

~Examiner

Since its passage, the Arizona anti-illegal immigration has been attacked by all forms of left-wing critics. Those criticisms came in various forms from various people. Some of the criticism came from simple race-baiters like Al Sharpton. Some came from people who had not even read the bill like Attorney General Eric Holder and Secretary of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano. It came from liberal cities like Los Angeles and San Francisco who have pledged to boycott the state of Arizona. And it even came from Mexican President Felipe Calderon, with approval from Barack Obama and a standing ovation from Democrats in the U.S. Congress.

All of these critics take issue with the law over the same reason – that it will lead to racial profiling and discrimination, particularly against Latinos. However, in expressing those concerns, are these critics not guilty of racial profiling and discrimination themselves?

Arizona of course shares a border with Mexico and many illegal immigrants cross that border to enter the United States. Therefore, it is logical to assume that a fairly high percentage of the illegal immigrants entering into Arizona would be Mexicans. However, it would be illogical to assume that they all are and to suggest otherwise would be a case of racial profiling and discrimination.

If that does not make sense then simply take the opposite view of someone suggesting that all illegal immigrants are Latinos. That type of suggestion would be considered discriminatory. However, these opponents of the AZ anti-illegal immigration law seem to be suggesting just that – that all of the illegal immigrants are Latinos and the law will lead to racial profiling and discrimination of those Latinos (and all Latinos as a result).

Illegal immigrants come in all forms and from all countries. The only illegal immigrant that this writer has ever known was a Russian lady. There are intelligence reports suggesting that would-be terrorists may be entering the U.S. via the porous border with Mexico (Of course, it is likely that not too many non-Mexicans try to enter the U.S. illegally through Mexico since Mexico’s immigration laws are much more stringent that those of the U.S., and they are actually enforced!) Given that the AZ law specifically prohibits police actions based on “race, color or national origin,” hopefully the police officers will treat everyone as a suspect if/when they do not have proper identification.

Many opponents of affirmative action programs often state that the problems of discrimination cannot be solved by putting in programs that discriminate in the opposite direction. With regards to the AZ anti-illegal immigration law, one could similarly suggest that opponents of it cannot decry it for potential racial profiling and discrimination of Latinos while simultaneously exhibiting racial profiling and discrimination against Latinos. To reiterate this note to the opponents of the ZA law: Not all illegal immigrants are Latinos, so stop acting like they are.

__________________________________________

Thousands march to protest Ariz. immigration law

~That’s the headline for ~AP but the very first sentence is…

TEMPE, Ariz. – Supporters and opponents of Arizona’s tough new crackdown on illegal immigration held separate rallies in Phoenix, drawing thousands of people from around the country.

Marchers carrying signs, banners and flags from the United States and Mexico filled a 5 mile stretch of central Phoenix, demanding that the federal government refuse to cooperate with Arizona authorities trying to enforce the law.

Police declined to estimate the size of the crowd, but it appeared at least 10,000 to 20,000 protesters, some bused in from around the country, braved 94-degree heat. Organizers had said they expected the demonstration to bring as many as 50,000 people.

Some used umbrellas or cardboard signs to protect their faces from the sun. Volunteers handed out water bottles and set up water stations. About 20 people were treated for heat or fatigue-related symptoms, and seven of them were taken to a hospital, said Phoenix police spokesman Sgt. Tommy Thompson. There were no arrests or other incidents, he said.

Read if you want, I don’t do ‘fluff’ from the MSM…

~Now read the truth from News Busted…

~I must STOP right there because anyone you has been here today, knows EXACTLY what was going on from this article…

UPDATED: Swastikas and Nazi References at Pro-Illegal Immigration Rally, Will Media Care?

Share
May 302010
 

Hot Air ~by Doctor Zero

One of the most striking moments in our increasingly surreal politics came when congressional Democrats leaped to their feet and applauded a foreign leader as he trashed the state of Arizona and its immigration law. The foreigner in question was the president of Mexico, a barely functional kleptocracy with vastly more restrictive immigration laws, enforced by a corrupt police force that has been known to beat and rob undocumented aliens. Arizona’s immigration law was prompted by the flood of people desperately seeking to escape Felipe Calderon’s miserable governance.

The sense of alienation between the United States and its Democrat Party grows steadily deeper. If you ask someone on the right side of our political spectrum whether they believe America is the greatest country on earth, you would most likely receive instant agreement. Ask the same question of someone from the Left, and the answer will probably be negative, or at least heavily qualified. If they agree at all, they’ll probably need at least five or ten minutes to get all the disclaimers and caveats out of the way… followed by the angry insistence they love their country.

Asserting the United States is the greatest country on Earth is not the same thing as declaring it flawless, or demeaning other nations as worthless. Even if you stipulate both of these points, you will rarely convince a liberal to concede its greatness. Most of them aren’t lying when they say they love it. The issue is the difference between love and reverence.

Liberals see themselves as enlightened crusaders, embarked on a quest to transform a fundamentally flawed America. They swoon when they hear Barack Obama speak of his “transformative” agenda. The “hope and change” mantra conjures an image of helpless little people waiting to be rescued. The transformation they have in mind is coercive – they’re not talking about transforming society by giving people more freedom to do what they want, or allowing them to express their will through greater amounts of income protected from taxation. It might be possible to rationalize inflicting forcible change on something you love, but you wouldn’t take that attitude toward something you revere.

You need to JUST read all of this article…

Share
May 302010
 

By Noel Sheppard

Here's one depicting Sheriff Joe Arpaio as a Klansman:

As HotAirPundit reported Sunday, these were some other signs at the event:

And another one calling Arizona a Nazi state:

Will media be as offended by these signs as they were when such things showed up at Tea Party rallies?

Stay tuned.

For over a year, America’s media have been depicting Tea Partiers as homophobic racists citing inflammatory signs at rally events as evidence.

On Saturday, pro-illegal immigration supporters in Phoenix, Arizona, carried signs quite similar to what our press found repulsive and extreme when present at conservative protests.

Will swastikas and the Arizona governor being referred to as “Adolf Brewer” be equally unacceptable to America’s media?

Before you answer, consider the following news segment from NBC12 in Phoenix wherein an anti-SB 1070 protester was interviewed holding a sign emblazoned with swastikas claiming “Republicans Breed Ignorance,” and the reporter didn’t even bat an eye (video follows with commentary and additional pictures):

Share
May 302010
 

liberteaparty — May 26, 2010 — Jefferson Parish Homeland security director Deano Banano stated that he was warned that because of his actions Monday that military troops could be sent to arrest him and parish president Nungesser!!!

Char, keep watching them…you do an amazing serive, have for years! Thank you!

Share
May 302010
 

By Bob Unruh

Justice Earl Warren


Critics of a recent successful move to restore some of America’s traditional historical references to textbooks in Texas launched a long list of criticisms against a conservative education board member who dared to mention Jesus and the Christian faith in a meeting invocation.

Then the critics discovered the words were penned by the late Supreme Court Justice Earl Warren, whose tenure on the court was marked by the removal of prayer from public schools and other similar moves.

“Those who wish to revise American history are often ignorant of history,” said Mathew Staver, founder of Liberty Counsel. “Some secularists wish to revise history in order to bury America’s rich religious heritage.

“It was the Great Awakening that preceded the American Revolution. Without a religious revival, there would have been no lasting civil liberty, and without the American Revolution, there would be no America,” he said.

“Those who wish to exclude God from our history either suffer from dementia or are dishonest,” said Staver.

The invocation delivered by Texas Board of Education Member Cynthia Dunbar, a professor at Liberty University School of Law

TXFreedomNetwork — May 21, 2010 — Texas State Board of Education member Cynthia Dunbar opens debate on new social studies standards with a politically divisive prayer.

Full Article

Share